MBA Programs with perspective as Tag

Strategic For Business Leadership Course at Khon Kaen University

College of Graduate Study in Management at Khon Kaen University

900 732 Strategic For Business Leadership
Future Leader in any uncertainty, change or expectation of modern business. Concepts of leadership in various forms, influences of leadership in business perspective, for instance, innovation, operating efficiency, human resources management, changes and survival of organization. studying from experiences of actual business leaders role models.

Firms, Corporations, and Capitalism Course at The University of Tokyo

Faculty of Economic at The University of Tokyo

4017: Firms, Corporations, and Capitalism
Summer Iwai
This course analyzes the economic functions, legal structure and social actions of corporate firms in advanced capitalistic society from an interdisciplinary perspective. It also plans to discuss the relationships between economy, law and ethics by reexamining the notion of “trust” and “fiduciary” in civil society.

Management Science Course at The University of Tokyo

Faculty of Economic at The University of Tokyo

3308: Management Science
Summer Yasuda
This course is concerned with$B!!(Bthe methods of network analysis and their application to organizational science. The intent of this course is to provide the student with both a perspective and a set of network measures which will enable him/her to analyze various social networks in his/her own research.

Business Architecture Course of MBA at Hitotsubashi University

ICS , Graduate School of International Corporate Strategy
[Term 3] Business Architecture (K. Kusunoki) (2009/Term 3&4 (Spring&Summer))

Business Architecture is positioned as an advanced course on strategy with the assumption that students who take this elective course already have some knowledge of Competitive Strategy and Organizational Capability.

Business Architecture is about “system consistency” as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Both perspectives on strategy (the SP-based view and the OC-based view) assume that the essential source of sustainable advantage lies in the consistency of a “system” of activities (SP) or resources (OC). In the SP-based view, if a company can establish a consistent system of activities, it is difficult for competitors to imitate that system because of the existence of trade-offs. The idea of the system-based sustainability of competitive advantage is more salient in the OC-based view. Fundamental concepts concerning costly-to-imitate capability, such as interconnectedness, social complexity, causal ambiguity, and path dependency, are all related to the idea that what is truly difficult to imitate is not each individual element of capability, but the way in which elements are combined to create a whole system of capability. In a modern competitive environment, a consistent system of activities and capabilities often lies at the heart of sustainable advantage.

For instance, Dell has outperformed its competitors, not because it has excelled in two or three particular elements, but because it has created a unique system (Dell Direct Model) that contains and combines dozens of elements. Thus, the business system as a whole shapes Dell’s competitive advantage. In many other industries and companies, the real competitive dimension has been shifting from element-level to system-level advantage. That is the reason why the “business models” has come into fashion in the business world. Although it is popular and easy to say that achieving consistency across activities, capabilities, and other boundaries is a linchpin of sustained advantage, business architecture and the architectural aspect of competitive advantage are poorly understood, underdeveloped subjects.

Shaping such system consistency needs deep insight and knowledge about the interdependence, interaction, and integration of individual activities and capabilities. This course, Business Architecture, focuses on these three aspects of system consistency (interdependence, interaction, and integration), which result in sustainable advantage.
Course Structure

This course is divided into three parts:
• Architectural perspective of strategy
• Modularity of business models
• Evolution of business models

It is quite difficult to characterize and analyze business models because they shape a complicated pattern, including many activities and capabilities with interdependence and interactions. Based on recent developments in these studies, the third part of this course uses the concept of “modularity,” i.e., the dimension ranging from modular architecture to integral architecture, as a key dimension of analyzing business models. Both modular and integral architecture have strengths and weaknesses, depending on the competitive environment and product/industry characteristics. Using this dimension as a key to understanding system-based advantage, this course will provide students with perspective on the integration of a firm’s strategic parts into a harmonious whole.

As an emerging arena of strategy thinking, this course is not about clearly defined tools and techniques to achieve architectural consistency of strategy. Instead, the primary objective of this course is to give a heuristic perspective and logic to view strategies in a holistic way.
Teaching Method

Business Architecture is primarily case-based. Most cases will be discussed in the traditional manner of case discussion, but some will be used for case-based lectures. There is no textbook for this course, but we will use some articles and book chapters. This course will include a couple of presentation sessions by student groups on assigned topics.

Competitiveness of Firms and Clusters Course of MBA at Hitotsubashi University

ICS , Graduate School of International Corporate Strategy
[Term 3] Competitiveness of Firms & Clusters (Y. Ishikura) (2009/Term 3&4 (Spring&Summer))

Today, competitiveness is discussed extensively at multiple levels: the level of the firm, city, region, and/or country. There are many competitiveness rankings available, addressing different levels, such as the Global Competitiveness Report by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness has become an important issue not only for the firm but also the nation/city/region, partly because of the advancement of ICT (Information & Communication Technology) and of globalization.

This course explores the determinants of competitiveness and economic development viewed from a bottom-up, business perspective. While sound macroeconomic policies, stable legal and political systems, and investment in human and physical capital create the potential for competitiveness, wealth is actually created at the business level. The sophistication and productivity of firms, the vitality of clusters, and the quality of the business environment in which competition takes place are the ultimate determinants of a nation’s or region’s productivity. Wealth is created not by governments, but by companies in the private sector.

This course covers both developing and advanced economies, and addresses competitiveness at the level of nations, regions, or cities within nations, clusters, and groups of neighboring countries. A major theme of the course is that competitiveness and economic development are affected by circumstances and policies at all of these levels.

The course is concerned with the role of government, and also with the roles of firms, universities, and other institutions in determining competitiveness. In modern international competition, the roles of these constituencies have shifted and expanded, and the traditional separation between them has worked against successful economic development.

Under these circumstances, business executives today are expected to play a more active role in shaping the business environment, which determines a nation’s, region’s, or city’s productivity. They are expected to have global and inter-disciplinary perspectives. They can no longer be concerned only with the domestic market or their industry. As world trade continues to increase, an open system for innovation is becoming more prevalent, and financial trouble originating in one market can affect the world very quickly.

Business executives can no longer focus only on the bottom line, as “companies can help create a better society while improving their bottom line, by focusing on contributions aligned with their core competencies and corporate missions…” (quoted from the WEF 2008 summary, Corporate Global Citizenship in the 21st Century”). As was pointed out at the WEF annual meeting in 2008, the collaboration of businesses, governments, and NGOs is perceived to be critical in resolving global issues, such as energy and the environment in today’s globalized world.

This course attempts to address these emerging issues facing future leaders, whether they are in companies, governments, other institutions, or civil society organizations. As such, this course is different from most MBA courses in the following respects. First, it is not purely a management course, but a course focused on economic development and prosperity. While it explores implications for companies and the new, expanded role of business executives, the course discusses the roles of other important constituencies, such as government and social entrepreneurial organizations.

The ability to mount and sustain a competitiveness improvement strategy for a nation or region is a daunting challenge. Thus, the course will explore not only theory and policy, but also the nature of the organizational structure, institutions, and processes required for sustained improvements in competitiveness.

Some of the questions which have emerged from past attempts to deal with the issue of competitiveness, economic development, and prosperity include the following:
• How can the economy move from one that is resource-based (such as those dependent on oil and other natural resources) to one that is investment-based and diversified?
• How can we create an innovative economy?
• How do we make these changes happen, as the process of improving competitiveness involves many diverse organizations with different agendas, mentalities, and thought processes?

The course was originally created by Professor Michael E. Porter at the Harvard Business School. It is offered not only in the Harvard University community, but also simultaneously by professors at other universities around the world.
Course Structure

The course consists of Three Modules. Module I discusses Firms, Industries, and Locations. Module II covers the Microeconomic Business Environment, which is the main topic of the course. Module III refers to the Economic Strategy for Nations, States and Regions. Advanced topics will be covered as well.

The course will build on topics such as “firms and industry competition” (covered in the Competitive Strategy course in Term 1) and problem definition and implementation (covered in the Problem Solving course in Term 2). The course will also touch upon issues such as the Mission, Vision, and Value of individual leaders, which will be covered during the Knowledge Week offered in June.
Teaching Method

The course will be taught using the case method, together with readings, lectures (both real and virtual), and guests (both real and virtual).

As it is a joint course with HBS and other institutions throughout the world, content is shared via the Internet.

We will show some videos of Michael Porter’s lectures and of the guests at the Harvard Business School. In addition, we plan to have some guests just for ICS.

Organizational Capability Course of MBA at Hitotsubashi University

ICS , Graduate School of International Corporate Strategy

[Term 2] Organizational Capability (K. Kusunoki) (2008/Term 1&2 (Fall&Winter))

Organizational Capability is positioned as an extension of the Competitive Strategy course with an aim to provide students with an integrative understanding of how to gain and sustain competitive advantage. Organizational Capability is well paired with Competitive Strategy as they are two sides of the same coin. Both courses are concerned with gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. The two courses, however, differ in perspective. Competitive Strategy is fundamentally a matter of effective positioning that differentiates a firm from competitors, and is based on a sophisticated understanding of external factors, such as industrial structure.

On the other hand, the perspective of Organizational Capability focuses on internal contexts of competitive advantage. Effective positioning alone is not sufficient to gain and sustain competitive advantage. There are two main routes to competitive advantage: SP (Strategic Positioning) and OC (Organizational Capability), and this course focuses on the latter route.

With these issues in mind, the course will push you to understand how a firm can fully exploit the potential advantage of differentiated strategic positioning. Theoretical aspects of the course are based on recent developments in the capability- (or resource)-based view of the firm. Since knowledge is the crucial ingredient for firm-specific, costly-to-imitate organizational capabilities, the course has substantial linkage to Knowledge Management.

Students who will take this elective course should recognize that this course is not about specific skills and tools for strategy formulation and implementation, but about a perspective to deepen understanding of strategy and competitive advantage. The capability side of competitive strategy is a new and emerging arena of strategy thinking, relative to the positioning-based strategy taught in Competitive Strategy. Different from positioning-based strategy, there are no common, well-developed concepts and frameworks for analyzing organizational capability like Five Force, Value Chain, and so forth. Furthermore, the idea of organizational capability mainly focuses on intangible aspects of competitive advantage, which are difficult to express as fully explicit knowledge. Nevertheless, I believe that Organizational Capability will provide tangible power as a useful heuristic to cultivate more comprehensive understanding of how and why a company can gain and sustain competitive advantage.
Teaching Method

The sessions are primarily case-based. Some cases will be discussed in the traditional manner of case discussion. Given the emerging nature of capability-based strategy, however, some sessions will use cases as supplements or illustrations for interactive lectures. The course will include one presentation session from groups of students.

Since there are no “standard” textbooks on capability-based strategy, this course will not use a particular textbook. Instead, the course uses some chapters from the following book as reading materials:

Saloner, G., Shepard A., & Podolny, J. (2001). Strategic management. New York: John Wiley
& Sons.

Since the course will directly touch only some chapters from the book, copies of the selected chapters to be used in the class will be included in the course binder. However, I strongly recommend that students buy this book because it is very good at creating a bridge between the capability view and positioning view of strategy. In addition, I will deliver some readings in the classroom that will be helpful as supplements to the topics and issues covered in this course.

International Organizational Behavior Course at Gadjah Mada University

International Organizational Behavior (EKM 3416)

This course offers an international perspective of organizational behavior. Specifically, this course elaborates the role and impact of globalization and cross-cultural management which include issues such as individual behavior, reward and punishment, leadership, motivation, teamwork, and organizational change and development. It is expected that by understanding the international perspective of individual, group, and organizational behavior, students will gain a broader knowledge on the theories and practices of managing workforce diversity.

International Human Resource Management Course at Gadjah Mada University

International Human Resource Management (EKM 3402)

This course provides an international perspective of human resources practices. Students are introduced to the strategic framework of international human resources management and its challenges. It extends to the international perspective of the topics discussed in the Human Resources Management course. The aim of the course is to build a better understanding of the HR practices of international companies.

International Business Course at Gadjah Mada University

International Business (EKM 3501)

This course deals with business functions in an international perspective. The course examines various concepts of international business, contingent international environment, international business strategies and their operations. It also addresses global issues and describes concepts relevant to international businessman, regardless of the extent of their international involvement. Dynamic strategy is also incorporated to provide a sustainable competitive advantage that enables organization to anticipate, respond, and adapt to the complexity and rapid change of the international business landscape. The course objectives are to enhance understanding of international perspectives for business activities, and to develop critical concepts for international business facing global competition.

Cost Accounting at Faculty of Economics Gadjah Mada University

Cost Accounting (EKA 2201)

This course discusses concepts, techniques, and latest development in production costing. The discussion includes cost accounting and analysis techniques useful in various industries and differing circumstances. Cost budgets and cost standards are illustrated as tools for planning, performance and managerial control. After taking this course, students are expected to have a broader perspective on the production cost determination as a critical element in price setting and performance evaluation.


Pages: 1 2 Next